Closing Data Center Loopholes

During the Town of Front Royal’s June 22, 2026 public hearing on proposed Data Center Zoning Text Amendments, I spoke near the end of a long night of public comment. More than 100 citizens addressed Council, with the meeting beginning at 7:00 PM and my turn to speak coming around 11:20 PM. The final vote did not occur until after midnight.

Many speakers focused on why they opposed data centers in Front Royal. I took a slightly different approach by focusing on the ordinance language itself. My concern was that even a well-intended ordinance could leave legal weaknesses, vague standards, or loopholes that future applicants might use to force projects through.

I urged Council to make any Special Use Permit a true hard gate, not a soft pathway or rubber stamp. I also asked that the definition of data centers be broad enough to cover AI computing, cryptocurrency mining, modular container units, telecommunications switching, multiple server buildings, and other industrial-scale server operations that might otherwise slip through narrow wording.

I also raised concerns about phrases such as “where possible,” “good-faith effort,” and “temporary water use by agreement.” Language like that may sound reasonable, but it can become an escape hatch if the ordinance is later challenged or interpreted too loosely.

My goal was not to help data centers get approved. It was to help the Town close loopholes before they could be used, protect the community, and reduce future legal risks while creating policy that is clear, durable, and enforceable.

Video 1. June 22, 2026 FRTC – Data Centers
Transcript (auto-generated)

Discover more from Lewis Moten

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading