-
Supporting Skydive Front Royal at the Warren County Airport
At the September 15, 2026 Warren County Board of Supervisors meeting, I spoke in support of leasing airport space to Skydive Front Royal. Here’s why I believe the business brings visitors and attention to our community. Read More
-
Historic District Parking Clarity
At Front Royal’s June 22, 2026 hearing, I asked Council to clarify whether Historic District parking exemptions protected rear-yard access, outdoor activity, and loading needs so downtown tourism uses would not be burdened by unclear rules. Read More
-
The Roads We Built for Yesterday
At the Warren County Secondary Six-Year Plan hearing, I reflected on last year’s “chicken scratch” font criticism before discussing how residential growth, tourism, delivery traffic, and short-term rentals are reshaping rural road usage, safety concerns, and long-term transportation planning priorities. Read More
-
Royal Visit Civic Discussion
I spoke before the Warren County Board of Supervisors to propose some form of annual recognition tied to the Royal Visit, as community discussions continue growing around tourism, heritage, local identity, & what lasting opportunities could emerge from the historic event. Read More
-
Crown & Commonwealth Conversations
What began as a petition inspired by the Royal Visit of King Charles III & Queen Camilla has evolved into a broader community conversation about tourism, heritage, identity, & the future of Front Royal & Warren County through recurring events, partnerships, & public engagement. Read More
-
From Historic Visit to Community Tradition
Following the historic visit of King Charles III and Queen Camilla to Front Royal and Warren County during VA250 anniversary events, a new petition proposes exploring an annual spring heritage-themed community event inspired by the region’s history, tourism, & international attention. Read More
-
Tourism Website Discussion vs Reality
Public comment highlights gaps between Warren County’s tourism website and reality, including broken pages, missing businesses, and lack of agritourism content. A review prompted by earlier discussions reveals inconsistencies in representation, execution, and the site’s effectiveness as a tourism tool. Read More