-
The Light Was Fixed. The Ceiling Was Not.
A burnt-out light was fixed quickly. The peeling ceiling above it became a recurring character. This post documents how a small facilities issue was noticed, acknowledged, joked about, apologized for, and ultimately preserved as a matter of civic record. Read More
-
Supervisors Meeting: Not All Transparency Looks the Same
An ordinary email of mine became part of the public record when it was read aloud in a tense boardroom. This post reflects on how process, power, and transparency collided—and how quiet procedural questions reshaped a highly political vote. Read More
-
Lewis Moten: Legal Policy
I agreed to have my views presented publicly, emphasizing accuracy and context. I clarified that my concerns focus on process, not opposition to transparency, and noted I was still evaluating whether additional policy layers were necessary beyond existing FOIA requirements. Read More
-
Richard Jamieson: Perspective on the Legal Services Transparency and Review Policy
A follow-up email from a county supervisor continuing a detailed defense of the Legal Services Transparency policy. It adjusted recipients, noted undisclosed BCC distribution, removed reporters, and expanded a point-by-point rebuttal grounded in FOIA law, governance norms, and legislative transparency principles. Read More
-
Cheryl Cullers: Legal Policy
A county supervisor requested permission to present my written perspective on the Legal Services Transparency and Review Policy during the January 8 supervisors meeting, acknowledging the value of the input and signaling that my comments would be incorporated into the public agenda discussion. Read More
-
Richard Jamieson: Perspective on the Legal Services Transparency and Review Policy
A public reply from a county supervisor reframing a private policy discussion into a transparency debate, copying other supervisors, staff, and local press. The message defends the Legal Services Transparency policy, cites FOIA law, and positions legislative legal analysis as part of the public deliberative process. Read More
-
Richard Jamieson: Perspective on the Legal Services Transparency and Review Policy
A brief reply from the WCFAC chair acknowledging the substance of my policy concerns, indicating a forthcoming detailed response to the full board, and referencing Virginia FOIA statutes and advisory opinions as relevant legal context for the discussion. Read More
-
Lewis Moten: Materials for Our Data Review Discussion
A reply to the WCFAC chair explaining my custom data-analysis workflow, limits of automation without stable county data access, and rationale for separating policy concerns into a broader supervisory discussion, while keeping this exchange focused on tools, methods, and transparent financial analysis. Read More
-
Lewis Moten: Perspective on the Legal Services Transparency and Review Policy
An email to the full Board of Supervisors outlining concerns with the Legal Services Transparency and Review Policy, arguing it creates legal, financial, and operational risks. Emphasized balancing transparency with attorney–client privilege, risk management, and effective governance. Read More
-
Richard Jamieson: Materials for Our Data Review Discussion
A follow-up email from the chair of the Warren County Finance Audit Committee responding to my data analysis work. It acknowledges the tools I built, asks about automation, repeatability, and analytical methods, and reflects continued dialogue on audit practices and transparency following a public meeting. Read More