12¢ vs. $1.20: Exposing the Broadband Pricing Gap

The Warren County Board of Supervisors meeting on February 18, 2025, felt like a pivotal moment for our rural infrastructure. As a resident of the North River District, I found myself standing alongside other concerned citizens to address two very different but equally significant topics: broadband equity and the definition of adult businesses.

Broadband: Parallel to the 1936 Electrification Act

The discussion regarding All Points Broadband (APB) and the BEAD Program struck a chord with me. Looking at the map, there is a massive, glaring hole in service for the southern end of our county. It reminds me of the Rural Electrification Act of 1936, which finally brought power to American farmers who had been left in the dark by private utilities.

Today, high-speed internet is the “electricity” of the 21st century. However, the data I’ve analyzed suggests we are falling short:

  • Substandard Speeds: The lowest proposed tier ($60 for 50 Mbps) doesn’t even qualify as “broadband” under the FCC’s updated March 2024 standards.
  • Pricing Inequity: In neighboring Fauquier County, residents are seeing rates of $60 for 1 gigabit. Meanwhile, our VATI proposal offers significantly slower speeds for satellite-level prices.
  • The Zoom Irony: I couldn’t help but notice that the vendors were presenting via Zoom to tout a service that many of our residents still can’t use to join a simple video call after their upgrade to “broadband”.

I suggested reaching out to regional commissions and looking at how nearby Culpeper and Rappahannock are handling their “exit plans” and discount addenda. Warren County shouldn’t settle for less.

I also submitted a letter to the editor to the Royal Examiner, along with charts comparing satellite and various broadband provider speeds in our area, titled “Concerns Raised Over Warren County Broadband Pricing.”

Concerns on Adult Business Definitions

The meeting also included a public hearing on amending the county code to add a definition for “adult business.” While the discussion focused on zoning and commerce, I shared the concerns of others regarding First Amendment rights.

Given the recent controversies surrounding the Samuels Public Library, there is a valid fear that vague definitions can be used as tools for social control or religious imposition. We must ensure that our codes are clear and do not infringe on individual rights or free commerce.

Final Thought

Whether it’s the price per megabit or the wording of a local ordinance, the details matter. Local government is where these “small” decisions have the biggest impact on our daily lives. I’ll continue to sip from the “firehose” of data to make sure our leaders are held to a standard of fairness and transparency.


Watch the Testimony

You can view the full discussion and my comments at the following timestamps:

  • 0:59 – John Jenkins on Adult Business & First Amendment Rights
  • 1:47 – Concerns over “sparse” coverage in South River
  • 2:26 – My testimony on Rural Electrification, FCC standards, and pricing comparisons
WCBOS Feb 18, 2025 Rural Broadband
Transcript (auto-generated)

Discover more from Lewis Moten

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading